Subj : Sio vs Sio2k
To   : Kevin Nunn
From : Mike Luther
Date : Sat Apr 09 2005 12:10 am

Kevin ..

KN> I am kinda stuck here, maybe some has some experience and might can
KN> help out. I have Sio 1.60 and Sio2k, each one has a problem running on
KN> my system, I have had to chose the lesser of two evils, but I'd like to
KN> get get one of them fixed.

I've got both of these registered as well.  I've never seen any issues at all
for dialup with either one of them.  Actually, I've got BBS systems running on
both on different boxes.  I can tell you that HyperHost works equally well on
either one.  But HyperAcess Pro doesn't work well on the client end to connect
to a HHost for me.  Thus for the box that is to run a remote site remotely, SIO
1.60 is better for that purpose.

Other than that I've not seen what you describle at all with dial-up ANSI
elements of Bink/Max operations here, nor even with Intermail running on the
same box in a DOS-VDM session as the OS/2 Bink/Max both POTS and Telnet for
more BBS operations on that same box!

Now ..

I'm curious.  Granted I've never seen what you describe.  But somewhere in the
back of my mind, I think I recall that you actually can run SIO 1.60 on a given
port and simultaneously run SIO2K on another port?

If so, that would be a heck of a way to solve the problem, but it might work?

Just a thought.


--> Sleep well; OS/2's still awake! ;)

Mike @ 1:117/3001




--- Maximus/2 3.01
* Origin: Ziplog Public Port (1:117/3001)

You are viewing proxied material from cvs.synchro.net. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.