Subj : XML
To : andrew clarke
From : Jasen Betts
Date : Mon Jan 06 2003 04:09 pm
Hi andrew.
05-Jan-03 17:00:44, andrew clarke wrote to Frank Vest
ac> Sat 2003-01-04 21:16, Frank Vest (1:124/6308.1) wrote to Jan
ac> Vermeulen:
>> There's nothing wrong with the SLF Nodelist. The problem is the
>> implementing of IP. That was not done right to begin with. :(
ac> It can be fixed. :-)
>> With PSTN, each mailer is expected to be able to transfer mail at
>> least at FTS-1 (x-modem?).
ac> Xmodem with TeLink extensions.
>> With IP, there is no minimum required transfer method. This means
>> that each protocol (binkp, telnet and such) has to have a flag in
>> the Nodelist.
ac> Are there any other common IP protocols other than BinkP & Telnet
ac> (ie. FTS-1 over Vmodem or equivalent)
protocol count comment
IFCICO 284 dunno
FTP 182 nothing like FTS1.
ac> You may as well make BinkP the minimum protocol.
yeah it seem most popular, what sort of software licence is involved?
-=> Bye <=-
---
* Origin: How to make Kleenex dance? Blow a little boogie in it. (3:640/1042)
