Subj : Easier solution?
To : Frank Vest
From : Jasen Betts
Date : Wed Jan 01 2003 07:14 pm
Hi Frank.
31-Dec-02 05:34:26, Frank Vest wrote to Charles Cruden
========================================================================
FV> Copied from FTSC_PUBLIC by Frank Vest (1:124/6308.1)
========================================================================
FV> On (30 Dec 02) Charles Cruden wrote to All...
FV> Hello Charles,
CC>> Comments / criticisms welcome....
CC>> Why not simply replace the phone number of an IP node with its IP
CC>> address or FQDN? After all, a phone number is the "contact
CC>> address" for a node in Fidonet, same as the IP / FQDN is for an
CC>> IP node. For
FV> I'd really rather not be known as 1:124/6308 /and/ 1:124/8308 :)
FV> However, that may be the best way to do this.
FV> FWIW: Many, if not all, of the ideas agrued and passed around here
FV> have merit. The problem is going to be getting one of them into
FV> operation /without/ making a dozen new "standards" to follow. To
FV> do this, IMHO, will require the joint efforts of the *C structure
FV> and the FTSC.
The FTSC hasn't started working yet, but there are a number of members here
participating.
-=> Bye <=-
---
* Origin: Money is the root of all wealth. (3:640/1042)
