Subj : linked
To : Gordon Lewicky
From : Jasen Betts
Date : Tue Dec 17 2002 04:25 pm
Hi Gordon.
14-Dec-02 21:32:06, Gordon Lewicky wrote to Frank Vest
GL> Quoting Frank Vest to Gordon Lewicky Subj. linked, dated
GL> 14-Dec-2002 10:35
GL> Hi ya Frank,
FV>> I understand your point. Would the "location" field be better?
FV>> Or is where you live as important to you as your name and your
FV>> system name?
GL> Well, if we're gonna throw out the geography rule, then to me at
GL> least, location is important since we can no longer depend on
GL> zone, region, net! And I sure can't figure out where
GL> bbs.micronet.com is! :)
GL> Actually, I'm getting somewhat annoyed at this trend to
GL> impersonality in this supposed network of computer enthusiasts. If
GL> I want impersonality, I'll go on the net.
GL> I happen to enjoy knowing who the sysop is, what their bbs name
GL> is, and where they park their butt! :)
FV>> Using a flag to indicate the IP or domain address is fine too. As
FV>> long as it is /one/ flag instead of one for every IP protocol.
GL> I may be wrong, but basically there are only 2 different connect
GL> addresses, domain name or ip, and email addy.
GL> Surely we can accomodate these 2 somewhere in the line without
GL> mucking around with sticking them where they shouldn't be.
They can go in the flags.. INA and IEM (or attached to the mailer flags)
the 157 limit though may meed that there is less room got other fields
like sysop name, location, and system namee.
GL> But this kludging addys into various former fields is exacly that,
GL> kludging.
so is attaching data to flags,
possibly in the future they'll work out a multi-line format so there;s more
room, or maybe go to a totally different format.
-=> Bye <=-
---
* Origin: How to make Kleenex dance? Blow a little boogie in it. (3:640/1042)
