Subj : proposed new nodelist [2]
To : Malcolm Miles
From : Jasen Betts
Date : Fri Jul 19 2002 12:19 pm
Hi Malcolm.
18-Jul-02 13:47:46, Malcolm Miles wrote to Jasen Betts
MM> On Jul 16, 2002 Jasen Betts wrote to Peter Knapper:
PK>> Malcolm Miles has found a solution that looks like it fits the
PK>> bill nicely.
JB>> Yeah it does indeed.
MM> Now all we have to do is find some developers that will include
MM> the proposal in their product. There is virtually zero development
MM> being done on Fidonet software except for some in Russia. I am
MM> sure that the Russian developers don't read this echo
It'll be a few months atleast before Im in any position to develop IP
capable fido software (no internet connection here yet so I'd just be
testing on a lan...)
JB>> PSTN nodes would still need the weekly nodediff, as would those
JB>> Iinternat capable nodes using existing software.
MM> All nodes would still need the nodelist as it defines who belongs
MM> to Fidonet. Sysop details, location, status (down, hold) would
MM> only be included in the nodelist
nah noded using existing software still need all the info they needed
yesterday and if they don't know how to get it from a DNS they'll need
to get it from the nodelist... after a while most nodes will probably
upgrade their software... but when?
-=> Bye <=-
---
# Origin: Know thyself. If you need help, call the C.I.A. (3:640/531.42)
* Origin: Baddog BBS (1:218/903)
