Subj : linked
To : Frank Vest
From : mark lewis
Date : Mon Dec 16 2002 12:04 am
FV>> Let me go through this a little better and see what gets
FV>> stirred up.
ml>> you got it! <<GG>>
FV> Oh gawd! You're here too?? <GD&R> :)
hehehe...
FV>> Binkp, telnet and ftp are protocols for IP. Just as zedzap,
FV>> emsi, zmodem and others are protocols for POTS.
ml>> i use zedzap, emsi, zmodem, and others on IP with relatively no
ml>> problems...
FV> With telnet?? i wager?
yup!
FV>> Of course, the argument is that with POTS, the protocols
FV>> are negotiated upon connection. There is a thread in the
FV>> FTSC_PUBLIC echo that is attempting to work out just such
FV>> a thing for IP Nodes.
ml>> it can be done in IP mailers just exactly like it is done in POTS
ml>> mailers... trouble is, it seems, that coders don't want to or haven't
ml>> figured out how ;-(
FV> Yup. Always go with the new, no matter what, just because. :(
that and not having to figure out how to make the others or get them all to
work together... i remember the dance that EMSI caused when it was originally
introduced...
FV> Was my description/proposal/argument accurate and well
FV> presented?
yes, pretty much...
FV> Did I make sense?
yes...
FV> What is your opinion on the idea?
hummm... need to go back and reread it again... that was several days ago and
i've been "occupied" since then <<wink>>
