Subj : proposed new nodelist [2]
To : Jasen Betts
From : Malcolm Miles
Date : Thu Jul 18 2002 03:47 pm
On Jul 16, 2002 Jasen Betts wrote to Peter Knapper:
PK> Malcolm Miles has found a solution that looks like it fits the
PK> bill nicely.
JB> Yeah it does indeed.
Now all we have to do is find some developers that will include the proposal in
their product. There is virtually zero development being done on Fidonet
software except for some in Russia. I am sure that the Russian developers don't
read this echo.
JB> PSTN nodes would still need the weekly nodediff, as would those
JB> Iinternat capable nodes using existing software.
All nodes would still need the nodelist as it defines who belongs to Fidonet.
Sysop details, location, status (down, hold) would only be included in the
nodelist.
JB> could PSTN nodes could have DNS entries without having IP addresses
JB> (I expect malcolm knows the answer to this), that could help.
Doesn't make any sense. The DNS is a mechanism for converting names to IP
addresses. No IP address, no need for a DNS entry.
