Subj : human-readable nodelist format
To : Scott Little
From : andrew clarke
Date : Sun Nov 10 2002 04:00 pm
Sun 2002-11-10 10:44, Scott Little (3:712/848) wrote to andrew clarke:
ac>> I can't decide whether you're saying it's too difficult to parse or
ac>> not.
> Fully specifying the address for each node bothers me, esp. in
> conjunction with the Uplink field.
Why?
> * Initial version. Currently the Uplink field in the human-readable
> * nodelist is ignored by rnlcvt. Which assumes the input file is
> * already in hierarchical order.
> A _correct_ implementation will be more complex unnecessarily in the
> name of human readability.
Not really. But keep in mind that rnlcvt's aim was just to check the valididty
of nlcvt's output.
> Much easier to extract a human readable list from a strict format
> than the other way around.
True. But still pretty simple.
--
[email protected]
--- Msged/NT 6.1.1
* Origin: Blizzard of Ozz, Mt Eliza, Victoria, Australia (3:633/267)
