Subj : way ot, was need some maximus ...
To   : Richard Webb
From : Russell Tiedt
Date : Sun Mar 08 2009 09:00 pm

Hello Richard.

26 Feb 09 20:11, you wrote to me:

RW>> I sent you nm through Janis once iirc, and same thing
RW>> happened.  REsent through my primary uplink, 3634/12 and it
RW>> arrived and you replied.  <hmmmm>

I have a direct link to 3634/12 ...

RW> True enough.  AS Janis explains, bbbs seems to be rather
RW> sticky about its interpretation of fidonet tech standards.
RW> MEthinks it has to do more with the way squish handles
RW> routing when used with static mailers such a binkley,
RW> although I don't know what the heck it is.  MEthinks that's
RW> why Sean's nm to you is somewhere in limbo world as well
RW> <g>.

BBBS is a good, package, just when I looked at it, I got the impression, it
was built for some other network, and FidoNet got tacked on afterwards ...

RW> I'm linked to both fido_sysop and fn_sysop.  Also, since
RW> this is essentially an argument between squish and bbbs
RW> which causes the problem tub might be appropriate as well.
RW> Seems to be that imho anyway.

I am connected to all of those ...

Russell

--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5
* Origin: Rusty's BBS - Bloemfontein, Free State, South Africa (5:7105/1)

You are viewing proxied material from cvs.synchro.net. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.