Subj : Installing 32
To   : Richard Webb
From : Minh Van Le
Date : Sat May 24 2008 08:02 pm

Hello Richard !

On 22-May'08 23:33, Richard Webb wrote to Minh Van Le:

MVL> Man you mean you haven't hooked up NetFOSS or Netserial -
MVL> what have you been DOING.

RW> Nope, not on a dial-up internet connection on one line.

It still would have worked. Heh.

RW> VOlunteers is more the right word, I object to the "hobby"
RW> designation myself. SHall we just say for volunteer
RW> emergency communicators <g>.

That would be more sensible.

RW> I"ll give it some study then, see what happens, but looks
RW> like i"ll be running the lnux executables ,g>.

The problem with the Linux version of Maximus is that it's more flakey, less
tested and unsupported.

RW> True enough, but staying with plain text for most displays,
RW> it's about the info, and it's about being able to connect
RW> to it with just about anything. IF all you've got is an old
RW> 1200 baud modem it has a landline.  No slow to load
RW> graphics, no hassles with what plug-ins your browser has.

You don't need plugins for HTML.

There's nothing a BBS can't display that can't be done with HTML.

In an emergency I personally would prefer point'n'click interfaces when
browsing for information instead of telnet.

Up to you.

RW> From your discussion above it sounds like the linux
RW> executable is my way to go here. oR running the dos
RW> executable on the 98 machine.

To my knowledge only Netmodem virtual modem will work under Win9x.

RW> I think option 3 sounds like the way to go here <g>.  Have
RW> one linux box anyway that will be networked but have other
RW> plans for it.

Just dump everything on one box.

It's called vertical scaling. Heh.

--- Msged/386 4.30
* Origin: ypan.dyndns.org loves Msged... (3:712/104)