Subj : The BBS has ended for unknown reasons.
To : Shawn Highfield
From : Mvan Le
Date : Fri Jul 27 2007 09:40 pm
* Original Area: C.9.Local
* Original From: Bob Jones (1:343/41)
* Original To : Mvan Le (1:343/41)
...
BJ> It probably works on your BBS setup because you have
BJ> matching compression and decompression routines.....
ML> I was going to scrutinise your Compress.Cfg for clues
ML> but I don't think it's compression related because it
ML> appears that any upload / file transfer whatsoever from
ML> me to your BBS is breaking.
Based on your additional comments, that is probably where the problem is. I
was also thinking modem not telnet session. How are you opening the telnet
session? Are you using 8 bit clear protocol? If you are using a 7bit protocol
or one that escapes certain character sequences, the upload will fail on those
escape sequences. I believe the VMODEM support under Ray Gwin's SIO that we
use on OS/2 boxes requires an 8 bit clean telnet session. A lot of telnet
sessions will assume 7 bit and/or an escaped character set by default.
ML> I've attempted some test uploads: "lanius.zip" and
ML> "bitsbaud.mec" which both failed. I think lanius.zip
ML> was created with WinZip 8.0, and bitsbaud.mec is just a
ML> flat MECCA file -- the aim was to test if your upload
ML> process would yield different results between
ML> compressed and uncompressed file uploads (which it
ML> didn't).
Ok, this is probably a telnet connection issue....
ML> Are you currently able to upload files via that Zmodem
ML> protocol to your own BBS ? and is it the Maximus
ML> internal Zmodem ? -- the Maximus internal Zmodem is
ML> what I use for my BBS and uploads with mTelnet work
ML> fine.
The BBS is using the built in internal transfer protocols. The only one I've
played with in the past that was an external protocol was for kermit support.
If I had kermit support running, that would probably get around the problem
being experienced.
ML> I'm using pkzip to upload *.REP packets to Vertrauen
ML> (Rob Swindell's BBS ( telnet://vert.synchro.net))
ML> successfully. He's runnin his stuff on W2k+3 ...
ML> So I don't know what the problem is. I can only suspect
ML> it's OS/2. I seem to be having lots of probs with
ML> uploading stuff to OS/2, albeit thus far observed only
ML> from Bob Juge's and your BBS.
ML> Anyway, I've provided below some details with what I've
ML> attempted to do for each of your available compression options.
Thanks.....
ML> I'm using PkPak from 1988 and PkZip (1993) so I don't
ML> think they're too "new" for your ARC 5.xx and Info-zip.
The PkPak from 1988 may be too new for ARC..... Just check, my arce program
produces a 1987 copyright date. The PkZip should be ok for the Info-Zip. [The
ARC implementation is the one "stardard" for fidonet, which dates back to about
1984 or 1985 as I recall.]
ML> +-----------------+
ML> | Your ARC Option |
ML> +-----------------+
ML> CMD: "C:\tmp\pkpak -a tophat2.rep *.msg"
ML> Version: PKPAK FAST! Archive Create/Update
ML> Utility Version 3.61
ML> 08-02-88 Copyright (c) 1986-1988 PKWARE Inc.
ML> All Rights Reserved.
ML> PKPAK/h for help
This looks like what you are running on your end to compress the message prior
to uploading.
ML> +----------------------+
ML> | Your Info-zip Option |
ML> +----------------------+
ML> CMD: "C:\tmp\pkzip tophat2.rep *.msg"
ML> Version: PKZIP (R) FAST! Create/Update Utility
ML> Version 2.04g 02-01-93
ML> Copr. 1989-1993 PKWARE Inc. All Rights
ML> Reserved. Shareware Version
ML> PKZIP Reg. U.S. Pat. and Tm. Off. Patent No. 5,051,745
Ditto. I know I'm using InfoZip on this end.
ML> +-----------------+
ML> | Your LHA Option |
ML> +-----------------+
ML> CMD: "C:\tmp\lha a tophat2.rep *.msg"
ML> Version: LHA version 2.13
ML> Copyright (c) Haruyasu Yoshizaki, 1988-91
ML> === <<< A High-Performance File-Compression Program >>>
ML> ======== 07/20/91 ===
That should be compatible with my newer LHArch support (the version 2.x
support, not the version 1.x support).
ML> If you've got time perhaps you can try uploading files to yourself using
ML> mTelnet or other client with Zmodem.
Ah... telnet. I belive I've tested in the past with Binkley from the OS/2 box
to the OS/2 box. Which means I'm using the TCP/IP channel as OS/2 expects it.
Try an 8 bit clear telnet session....
ML> Apart from that, I think we've reached the end of the line with this.
Thanks for the info.
Bob Jones, Sysop, Top Hat BBS
--- Maximus/2 3.01
* Origin: Top Hat 2 BBS (1:343/41)