Subj : Another filearea question
To : Mvan Le
From : mark lewis
Date : Wed Jun 13 2007 02:51 pm
ml> MvanL> dropfile and "those" dorinfo(x|#).def dropfiles ?
ml> do you understand the meaning of "POST THE SPECS OR A LINK
ml> TO THEM"?
MvanL> If you want specs then look in the source code.
do you understand the difference between specs and code? code isn't specs
althought specs may contain sample code...
MvanL> Maximus creates "dorinfo1".def for ALL NODES, and always has.
ok [shrug]
ml> you've still not provided the proof of this... i'm more
ml> than willing to look at it once it is made available...
ml> i would hope that it is written by the original author
ml> of the dorinfox.def specification ;)
ml> MvanL>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dropfile:
ml> oh, cool... i'll go fix that right now...
MvanL> Haha you're not fixing anything, and merely
MvanL> demonstrating your pedantic childish need to challenge
MvanL> everything when the evidence is [...]
there is no evidence in that abandoned wikipedia article...
ml> hint: don't take wikipedia as gospel...
ML> I have obliged your request for documentation.
not with that link to wikipedia... obviously you don't know wikipedia and the
policies they have, either ;)
[trim]
ml> MvanL> You therefore are a victim of misinformation.
ml> in this instance, your mistake is in believing unproven
ml> and undocumented writtings that you read on wikipedia
MvanL> By the same token your mistakes derive from your poor
MvanL> deductive abilities.
i can, at least, program in whatever language i choose to for the job at
hand... even if it is Pascal, which you just toss off as being out of date due
to its age with total disregard for the fact that your chosen language is just
as old and out of tune with today's reality...
whatever, you just go right on ahead building that negative karma, eh? ;)
)\/(ark
* Origin: (1:3634/12)
