Subj : areafix bug?
To : Stephen Walsh
From : mark lewis
Date : Mon Apr 13 2020 08:40 am
Re: areafix bug?
By: Stephen Walsh to mark lewis on Mon Apr 13 2020 21:46:31
ml> that must be tom's new node, eh? i don't have an answer for the
ml> problem... only dropping a line to note that i've been helping him get
ml> his FTN stuff going and he/we were wondering why there hadn't been a
ml> response to his areafix request at the time it was sent... delayed
ml> processing maybe? no matter, really... just curious ;)
SW> The mail hub system process mail just a few seconds after it's
SW> dropped off.
cool... i wasn't sure... some systems (still) use scheduled processing instead
of instant...
SW> I have done a test from my bbs system, and it receives the message
SW> about not fiding +ALL as well, so it's not Tom's system at fault.
ok... i know we found some few problems here and there with his mailer setup
that we got fixed... missing directories here and there and a few other
things... we got that all fixed and we were able to test direct netmail between
our systems... had tried before but scott's system bounced my routed reply
because tom wasn't in the nodelist yet... that should be a non-problem pretty
soon, i guess ;)
SW> this issue wasn't present in versions before 1.0.7.13, as I've had
SW> nodes use the %+ALL before.
yeah, sounds like a bug in recent versions... i saw vince posted about another
bug, too... but anyway, hope you guys find and kill this bug pretty easily :)
)\/(ark
--- SBBSecho 3.10-Linux
* Origin: SouthEast Star Mail HUB - SESTAR (1:3634/12)
