Subj : Re: This version of LordCfg...
To : Donald Tidmore
From : michael preslar
Date : Tue Jul 10 2007 01:02 am
> 1. No one seems to be able to get Preslar to send them *ANY* betas of LORD in
> the last six+ months - that I have ever heard of.
I haven't sent out betas since like September or October.. Not publicly,
anyway. There was some work done on lord/x and lord/32. But you wouldn't
know that since you weren't involved.
> Until Michael stopped responding to email inquiries about LORD,
"Until Michael stopped responding to _my_ email"
There. Fixed.
> he personally had told me in summer 2006 that he did NOT know yet how to get
> Lord/X to run igms. LORD for OS/2 is unable to run igms also. You can ONLY
run
> igms with DOS LORD and with LORD for Windows. If that situation has changed,
I
> need to know who exactly wants Linux Lord IGms, and is interested in making
> them.
1) "summer 2006".. Long time ago. Who knows what might have changed
since then.
2) "If the situation has changed, I need to know". Why?
> releases, whereas mine is in inactive development due to lack of feedback on
> how it works.
Let me ask a hypothetical question. If I didn't get any feedback, would
it be okay for me to chill out for awhile?
> This entire "Preslar is dead" storyline is a waste of everyone's time. I've
> been assured by at least two people that he is still alive. I think its time
> for people to drop the "he's dead" topic.
I died. Seriously. A yak with emphysema tried to take my cig, so I bull
rushed him. But he was much bigger than I was, and trampled me. At least
it wasn't as embarrassing as my wedding night. These days, people talk
to my ghost.
--
Michael
--- SBBSecho 2.11-Win32
* Origin: Data Stream - telnet://dsbbs.net - www.dsbbs.net (1:124/7013)
