Subj : Sorry for dupes. Completely rewrote send
To   : August Abolins
From : Brother Rabbit
Date : Sat Sep 12 2020 04:18 pm

Answering a msg from August Abolins:
>Hello Charles!
>
>** On Saturday 12.09.20 - 06:50, Charles Pierson wrote to Stas Mishchenkov:
>
> CP> I have a question.  Elsewhere you were talking about the
> CP> portability of the gateway.  If multiple nodes had
> CP> gateways, wouldn't that increase duplicate messages
> CP> throughout?  As the messages worked their way through the
> CP> Fido system, any gateways which received them would then
> CP> send them to Telegram, which could keep the process going
> CP> ad infinitum?
>
>The way I understand it: firstly, if the groups are kept
>private super-groups (which they should be), TgM users would
>link up by invitation.  It is possible that in the future, BBS
>X could be hosting a gate bot, and so could BBS Y.  But, a
>user would only need to pick one for a specific echo. Then,
>since all messages get converted into fido format, they would
>have unique MSGIDs anyway.
>
>
>--
>  ../|ug

This can become a problem when the same messages from Fido will appear in the same Telegram group, gated on different nodes with different msgid.


--- tg2fido.pl
* Origin: Telegram to fido gate by Stas Mishchenkov (2:460/58)

You are viewing proxied material from cvs.synchro.net. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.