Subj : And what prevents us from creating an echo conference of the same n
To   : Stas Mishchenkov
From : August Abolins
Date : Sat Nov 21 2020 09:21 am

Hello Stas!

** On Saturday 21.11.20 - 13:54, Stas Mishchenkov wrote to Wilfred van Velzen:

SM> Hi, Wilfred!

SM> 20 ��� 20 20:53, Wilfred van Velzen -> Stas Mishchenkov:

WvV>> Not to confuse people to much I think the names should be the same on
WvV>> both sides. So how about TELEGRAM.FIDONET, unless someone has a
WvV>> better idea?

SM> May be it will be better tu use FIDONET.TELEGRAM tag?


Personnally, I think the following fits the "idea" of the
concept of accessing Fidonet using the Telegram app:

 FIDONET_X_TELEGRAM

 ..where the X represents "-by-" and suggests a two-way
exchange as well.

Before that, I was partial to a mirror approach:

 TENODIF.MARGELET

Another was a mashup:

 TIDONET.FELEGRAM

FIGHTONET.HELLEGRAM was another one that popped in my head.

All of the above portray many of the qualities and attitudes
some people have: reflection, confusion, denial, cooperation.

:)

On we go.

--
 ../|ug

--- OpenXP 5.0.47
* Origin: Got mobile? FUTURE4FIDO = https://tinyurl.com/yx9z6d37 (2:221/1.58)

You are viewing proxied material from cvs.synchro.net. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.