Subj : Question about telegram
To   : Alan Ianson
From : August Abolins
Date : Fri Nov 20 2020 11:06 pm

Hello Alan!

** On Friday 20.11.20 - 19:09, Alan Ianson wrote to August Abolins:

AI> As far as I remember NET_DEV is all about Fido and/or FTN
AI> technology. It's mostly rather techie and regular fido
AI> users would be uncomfortable there, but I think
AI> discussion of telegram or the tg gate would fit there
AI> nicely.

Maybe someone else could chime in, but the linkup from Stas'
BBS (Lame Users Breeding) and fido is copacetic.

NET_DEV seems to be limited to internode cooperation wrt the
technology or code required to moving data between nodes, all
fido-side.  The Telegram concerns presented here have nothing
to do with that.

Perhaps the *real* development that is needed could be
discussed and honed in TELEGRAM_ATTITUDE_DEV  ;)


AA>> I would rather see a TELEGRAM.FIDONET echo for discussion on
AA>> that topic.

AI> I like this idea best myself. It was my RC who suggested
AI> this idea to me. He is not hating on telegram but he does
AI> have questions as others have that I was not able to
AI> answer.

I would be in favour of moving Telegram debate (and any
dubious attitude) over there.

So, who wants to set up TELEGRAM.FIDONET?  Should it be part
of the elist system? I don't mind talking to the elist bot.


--
 ../|ug

--- OpenXP 5.0.47
* Origin: Got mobile? FUTURE4FIDO = https://tinyurl.com/yx9z6d37 (2:221/1.58)

You are viewing proxied material from cvs.synchro.net. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.