Subj : Re: And what prevents us from creating an echo conference of the same n
To   : Stas Mishchenkov
From : Wilfred van Velzen
Date : Fri Nov 20 2020 08:53 pm

Hi Stas,

On 2020-11-20 21:07:08, you wrote to me:

WvV>> A new echomail area TELEGRAM. Or TELEGRAM.FIDONET would be a good
WvV>> idea though, I think.

SM> Ok. Let's do it!

WvV>>  Or can a gated area have different names on the Telegram
WvV>> and Fidonet side?

SM> Yes. The name of the group now may be completely different from ECHOTAG.
SM> Such groups even already exist.

WvV>>  Than it can be TELEGRAM on the fidonet side and FidoNet
WvV>> on the Telegram side. ;-)

SM> Yes. It can be that way.

SM> I really liked both of your ideas. We can create a FIDONET.TELEGRAM group
SM> associated with TELEGRAM.FIDONET echo and/or link the FidoNet group with
SM> the TELEGRAM echo. It is very important that they are international and it
SM> is desirable to have one of these groups open, public.

Not to confuse people to much I think the names should be the same on both sides. So how about TELEGRAM.FIDONET, unless someone has a better idea?

Bye, Wilfred.

--- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
* Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)

You are viewing proxied material from cvs.synchro.net. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.