Subj : max char test to TgM
To   : Dan Richter
From : Tommi Koivula
Date : Sat Oct 17 2020 09:43 am


17 Oct 20 00:19, Dan Richter wrote to Tommi Koivula:

DR> On 17 Oct 2020, 08:52a, Tommi Koivula said the following...

TK>> > Didn't have it when I saw the message. It could have been stripped
TK>> > somewhere along the line. Either that, or HPT strips it when the message
TK>> > is tossed.
TK>>
TK>> I noticed one thing. In Hpt/JAM the @INTL is not present, but in
TK>> Hpt/Squish it is. :)

DR> That's strange... Why would it be stripped for JAM? :/

No idea.. The same message direct from Stas to 2:221/6 tossed into JAM does not contain that line:

@MSGID: 2:460/58 00000410
@REPLY: 2:460/58 00000406
@PID: tg2fido_gate_v0.6.1
@CHRS: CP866 2
@TGUID: 534732808
@REPLYTO 2:460/58
@RealName: Stas Mishchenkov 2:460/58
@PATH: 460/58

And via Paul to 2:221/1 tossed into Squish:

@MSGID: 2:460/58 00000410
@REPLY: 2:460/58 00000406
@INTL 2:280/464 2:460/58
@PID: tg2fido_gate_v0.6.1
@CHRS: CP866 2
@TGUID: 534732808
@REPLYTO 2:460/58
@RealName: Stas Mishchenkov 2:460/58
@PATH: 460/58 640/1384

Maybe something to do with Hpt/Smapi.

'Tommi

---
* Origin: rbb.fidonet.fi (2:221/1)