Subj : Re: Nomination
To : Jason Bock
From : Tim Schattkowsky
Date : Thu Feb 27 2025 06:03 pm
//Hello Jason,//
on *27.02.2025* at *6:15:07* You wrote in Area *FTSC_PUBLIC*
to *Michiel van der Vlist* about *"Nomination"*.
JB> If you send a netmail to 2:2/29, it should go to Ward's system and sit
JB> there until Tim polls Ward's system since Tim does not have a url/IP
JB> listed in his nodelist entry.
JB> Zone,2,Eur_(024),B,Ward_Dossche,-Unpublished-,300,CM,MO,INA:many-glacier.
JB> dyndns.org,IBN,IFT,PING,IMI:
[email protected],U,ENC
JB> ,2,Fidonews_Editor,Sweden,Bjorn_Felten,46-31-960447,33600,CM,XA,V34,INA:e
JB> ljaco.se,IBN:24555 ,29,WinPoint_Help,D,Tim_Schattkowsky,-Unpublished-,300
Fantastic work.
JB> I have to review the voting/nomination rules, but he does have a node,
JB> just cannot crash to it. Maybe, the rules need to state that there has
JB> to be a way to crash mail to the operator. Again, I need to review the
JB> rules before standing on what I am thinking out loud here.
Interesting conclusion. So you believe, there is a rule missing to kick me out and want to invent one? Just to let everbody know about your mindset: Explain why that would be good.
I probably know more about fido technology then 99% of the other nodes combined. However, unlike some people here, I dont feel this urge to rule about something.
My impression is that you want to bully me out because a few guys already think that the whole remains of Fidonet are just their personal playground. Whole areas are taken over by single persons and flooded with their personal bullshit. Other traffic barely exists anymore.
I dont give much about FTSC. I wanted to help ... and you people do need help.
Regards,
Tim
--- WinPoint 415.0
* Origin: Original WinPoint Origin! (2:2/29)