Subj : Question on FTS-0001
To   : deon
From : Rob Swindell
Date : Tue Oct 17 2023 11:24 pm

 Re: Question on FTS-0001
 By: deon to Rob Swindell on Tue Oct 17 2023 08:59 am

>   Re: Question on FTS-0001
>   By: Rob Swindell to Andrew Leary on Sun Oct 15 2023 02:03 pm
>
>  > FTS-1 doesn't deal with echomail. If any FTSC doc needed "correction"
>  > (I'd say "clarification") in this regard, it'd be FTS-4.
>
> I'd disagree.

The norm/rules for netmail and echomail are different.

> The question that I started was (and I'll paraphrase) what was the
> origNet/origNode represent in a packed message header.
>
> The answers I've seen are:
> * Its the source message address,
> * Its the last hop's address
>
> It should be known as one or the other.
>
> The english description "orig..." implies it is from the source of the
> message, ie: the originator, but convention seems to be that it represents
> the last hop.
>
> That should be clarified and updated.

FTS-1 doesn't deal with echomail. You can wish it did, but it just doesn't.
--
                                           digital man (rob)

Breaking Bad quote #47:
He said he'll break my legs, he meant It... he gave me the dead mackerel eyes.
Norco, CA WX: 67.0�F, 70.0% humidity, 0 mph N wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs

You are viewing proxied material from cvs.synchro.net. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.