Subj : type 2.2 pkt header
To   : Maurice Kinal
From : Rob Swindell
Date : Fri Apr 14 2023 11:41 am

 Re: type 2.2 pkt header
 By: Maurice Kinal to Rob Swindell on Thu Apr 13 2023 07:48 pm

> Hey Rob!
>
>  RS> So *I* call FSC-48 compliant packets "Type 2+"
>
> Okay.
>
>  RS> and FSC-39 comliant packets as "Type 2e".
>
> That doesn't match any of the Types in the document in question.

Which document is that?

>  RS> but *might* be just 2e compliant.
>
> Gotta love when that happens.
>
>  RS> http://wiki.synchro.net/ref:fidonet_packets
>
> How does that compare to "FSP-1042 draft 7"?

I think the differentiation I've done between FSC-39 and FSC-48 compliant packets is important, to me at least, and I don't think that's well covered in the FSP-1042 draft. I recall finding a hole/error in FSP-1042 draft when I was updating the SBBSecho type-2 packet parsing/generation logic and creating that wiki page, but I seem to have lost that detail to time. I'll keep doing comparisons between the docs and my code see if that'll jar it loose.
--
                                           digital man (rob)

This Is Spinal Tap quote #5:
Nigel Tufnel: Authorities said... best leave it... unsolved.
Norco, CA WX: 57.7�F, 69.0% humidity, 4 mph E wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs

You are viewing proxied material from cvs.synchro.net. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.