Subj : type 2.2 pkt header
To   : Rob Swindell
From : Carlos Navarro
Date : Fri Apr 14 2023 11:46 am

13 Apr 2023 12:24, you wrote to Maurice Kinal:

>>  CN> FSC-39 or FSC-48?
>>
>> You tell me.  Without checking out either I am going out on a limb
>> and say neither.

RS> So *I* call FSC-48 compliant packets "Type 2+" and FSC-39 comliant
RS> packets as "Type 2e". Any packet claiming to be 2+ is likely FSC-48
RS> compliant, but *might* be just 2e compliant.

My tosser calls FSC-39 packets "Type 2+"...

RS> The details/differences are itemized here:
RS> http://wiki.synchro.net/ref:fidonet_packets

Yeah, that's an excellent reference guide.

My question was about the "defacto standard" that Maurice mentioned. It may seem that the most common is FSC-39: hpt, FMail, Squish, Mystic, etc.

Carlos

--- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20180707
* Origin: cyberiada (2:341/234.1)

You are viewing proxied material from cvs.synchro.net. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.