Subj : Re: 2023 FTSC Standing Member Election - Preliminary Results
To   : Michiel van der Vlist
From : Dan Clough
Date : Thu Mar 23 2023 07:33 am

-=> Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Andrew Leary <=-

AL>> I have received your challenge to the preliminary results.  In
AL>> reviewing historical precedent, ...

WD> Historical precedent states that you can only challenge the way how
WD> your own ballot was processed, not what happened to someone else's ...

MvV> There is no such historical precedent. Ward is making it up for
MvV> the occasion.

Yup.  I've asked him in a separate post to provide a citation to this
imaginary precedent, and I know exactly how he's going to respond (it
won't be with any actual reference/citation).

WD> Meaning Michiel's objection ought to be rejected.

MvV> Even if it could be demonstrated that such a hypothetical
MvV> precedence exists and a decision made by the vote coordinator can
MvV> only be challenged by a voter regarding his/her own vote, then by
MvV> that same reasoning Ward's challenge is null and void as he is
MvV> not a voter.

Game. Set. Match.

Case dismissed and closed.



... All the easy problems have been solved.
=== MultiMail/Linux v0.52
--- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
* Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (1:123/115)

You are viewing proxied material from cvs.synchro.net. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.