Subj : MSGID
To   : Rob Swindell
From : Bj�rn Felten
Date : Fri Feb 04 2022 03:54 am

RS>>> If you send a netmail there, it'll reach me. But that clause is only a
RS>>> "should" anyway. It doesn't *have* to be a valid return address for the
RS>>> originating network.

>> Says who?

RS> Says FTS-0009.001:

RS> "The originating address should be specified in a form that
RS> constitutes a valid return address for the originating network."

  I was more thinking about how you interpret "should" to "yeah, fuck that, it actually doesn't say I *have* to, so I ignore that totally, they probably just added the "should" for fun".




..

--- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; sv-SE; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101125
* Origin: news://eljaco.se:4119 (2:203/2)

You are viewing proxied material from cvs.synchro.net. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.