Subj : FTSC
To : Dale Barnes
From : Carol Shenkenberger
Date : Thu Nov 28 2019 10:07 am
Re: FTSC
By: Dale Barnes to Carol Shenkenberger on Tue Nov 12 2019 07:34 am
> > Dale, I think the true answer is a bit of all of the above.
> > I think from
> > observation most of us hit 2 of the 3 and most have some
> > level of all 3 though
> > one of them may not be obvious or may not relate to Fidonet
> > technology very
> > strongly. At least that's my 2 cents worth.
> >
>
> Agreed and thank you for the 2 cents. :)
>
>
Welcome Dale. Going back to some messages, I note I'd indicated some
discomfort with the set nodelist and recommended we at least consider
'extenuating circumstances'. While it does not seem to cause any candidates
problems, there might be a potential for Z4 RCs to be affected.
That type of activity falls in the '2 of 3' realm.
FTA-1001.007 speaks to the members of the FTSC in section 3.2 FTSC Standing
Members. The list is not all inclusive but has a critical 'or' placement
between developers and coordinators.
Same document BTW that I think might have formerly listed 'Invited Guests' (aka
technical advisors) but had some level of actual rules of behavor. Now, there
aren't any 'rules' really. Standing guest members are all sitting ZCs.
(presume if ICC was not a sitting ZC, they too would carry over to this).
