Subj : Re: FTSC Administrator - preliminary results
To : Carol Shenkenberger
From : Ward Dossche
Date : Tue Dec 11 2018 10:15 am
Carol,
CS> With me out of the picture, there is a query on a Sean vote? I don't
CS> know what is going on there.
You and I know Sean Dennis sent-in a vote, you and I know it wasn't counted,
you and know it isn't even mentioned.
My guess is it was a timing problem, too late, but it should have been
reported. Since it wasn't, it cast a shadow over this election. the question
then follows "How many other votes were not counted and for which reason?"
This election is tainted and there should be a re-run.
CS> So my proposal is if any FTSC member feels we need a runoff, we keep it
CS> short and sweet. It can be unfair to MVDL to drag it too long.
A run-off isn't needed but a re-vote from scratch with the same candidates,
c'mon Carol ...
- The voting has been compromised, whether or not it changes the outcome is
IMO irrelvant
- A vote went lost/unreported. What happened to that vote and why?
- The provisional winner has lobbied to have a particular vote-enumerator
- The vote-enumerator defends the outcome of the vote of which the winner is
the one who pushed to have that particular enumerator
- The vote-enumerator ruling on hmself?
Before anyone climbs in their pen ... did you hear me say anything fishy
happened? No you did not, I'm merely stating a veil was cast over this election
and a re-run would be appropriate.
And I still think we have a right to learn who did not vote, it wouldn't change
the outcome of the election either ... but it would the next-one.
\%/@rd
--- D'Bridge 3.99 SR40
* Origin: The best gold is at the bottom of barrels of crap (2:292/854)
