Subj : What would YOU do?
To : mark lewis
From : Carol Shenkenberger
Date : Mon Dec 10 2018 05:35 pm
Re: What would YOU do?
By: mark lewis to Carol Shenkenberger on Mon Dec 10 2018 10:13 am
CS>> It could be the wording is bad.
ML> agreed...
CS>> When it was written, the FTSC meant is there was an address on IBN,
CS>> it would priority over the INA address. If no address on IBN, it
CS>> would use INA. If only a port on IBN, use INA but the port on IBN.
ML> and if there is INA and IBN both with domains, use the IBN domain first
ML> and then the INA one... if the IBN contains a port number, use it for
ML> both...
I belive the intent was for 2 different domains in that scenerio (like mine).
I suspect if IBN had a port number and INA didn't then the port number should
only be used with that domain. I need to go back and read the relevant
documents to see how that was handled and if it was clear.
ML> PS: i've just sent you a direct netmail from this point. i watched it get
ML> delivered and am writing this just as a "head's up! please check your
ML> netmail or unsecure inbound."... it is a message forwarded from the mystic
ML> echo that was written back in july 2018...
Ok, will look for it. THats just before I joined zone21 where I get most of
my mystic information.
