Subj : Re: FTSC Administrator - preliminary results
To : Ward Dossche
From : Fred Riccio
Date : Mon Dec 10 2018 09:04 am
10 Dec 18 14:55, Ward Dossche wrote to Fred Riccio:
FR>>WD> the secrecy of the voting has now been compromised and the
FR>>WD> logical result would be that it is totally invalid.
FR>> There was no promise (or mandate) of secrecy, confidentiality, or
FR>> anonymity in the election rules.
WD> If the vote was not meant to be secret, there was no need for an
WD> elaborate password system
I don't consider it elaborate.
WD> and I personally think the electorate has a
WD> right to know who the voters are without disclosing the actual vote.
See my previous response to you. If the voters want to make it known, they
will.
FR>> That is correct. Under the rules of this election you have no right
FR>> to contest the results. I will not be excusing myself.
WD> The absence of the right to contest the result does not disqualify me
WD> from having an opinion.
Your opinion has been noted.
WD> There also seems to be a vote by Sean Dennis which went the way of
WD> the Dodo-bird and vanished. it is not mentioned in any of the
WD> reporting ... this is the 2nd questionable vote.
There must be some back channel I am not aware of.... Sean knows what happened
and he knows why. I notified him via NetMail. If he wants to discuss it here
let him bring it up himself.
Are you trying to bait me into another breach of confidentiality?
WD> I still think the proper thing is to step back and to announce a
WD> rerun with a new, yet to be decided-upon, enumerator.
I hear your opinion, but nothing you have said tells me that the results would
be any different.
--- Msged/NT 6.0.1
* Origin: Somewhere in New Hampshire's White Mountains (1:132/174)
