Subj : Out of the woodwork
To : Markus Reschke
From : mark lewis
Date : Wed Nov 07 2018 12:03 pm
On 2018 Nov 06 17:32:22, you wrote to Rob Swindell:
RS>> What I observed was not simple. The message had to split into
RS>> multiple fragments suitable for reading on 8-bit computers or some
RS>> such stupidity which disuades contributions from modern
RS>> technologists.
MR> The guideline for writing FSPs is stated in FTA-1002
MR> (
http://ftsc.org/docs/fta-1002.003). There is no requirement to split
MR> up documents into small junks or other such stupidity. It's the
MR> opposite:
i think he was talking about posting the document in this echo for
discussion... that all went well and there was one last little bit that was to
be fixed and posted once more for a (hopefully final) proofreading... after
that getting the final document to the FTSC via link or file attach or similar
should have put it on the FTSC desk for voting... we simply didn't get to the
last posting in this echo...
after that, another FTSC member tried to bring it up for discussion and that
kinda went quiet after a week or two... then the proposal number was recycled
and assigned to another document so now the one above needs another proposal
number and to be presented again...
yeah, i know :/
)\/(ark
Always Mount a Scratch Monkey
Do you manage your own servers? If you are not running an IDS/IPS yer doin' it
wrong...
... 93. You're never too old to need your mom.
---
* Origin: (1:3634/12.73)
