Subj : FTS-1 and FTS-4
To   : Bj�rn Felten
From : Rob Swindell
Date : Tue Nov 06 2018 01:12 pm

 Re: FTS-1 and FTS-4
 By: Bj�rn Felten to Rob Swindell on Tue Nov 06 2018 10:02 pm

>  RS> you have defined "The message format" (section 2a) which corresponds
>  RS> with
> the
>  RS> "Stored Message" defined in FTS-1.
>
>    Taking a second look at it -- four years later -- I can only agree with
> you.
> The entire section 2a should be moved down to make it clear that it's
> actually  the proprietary *.MSG storage format definition.
>
>    Albeit it's pretty much standard as a kinda fall-back it's not as obvious
> as
> it ought to be.

I agree its definitely "a standard", but it's not really a network standard. So
sure, it belongs in an FTSC document, just not the same document that defines
required packet format(s).

FTS-1 could be split up into probably 3 or 4 documents, at least, and some of
those resulting documents would not really be relevant to the network as it
operates today.

You are viewing proxied material from cvs.synchro.net. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.