Subj : Re: Log test
To : Nicholas Boel
From : Bill McGarrity
Date : Tue Nov 07 2017 07:33 am
-=> Nicholas Boel wrote to Bill McGarrity <=-
Hiya Nick...
NB> On 01 Jan 16 13:16, Bill McGarrity wrote to mark lewis:
ml>> you're quite welcome and thank you for taking the bull's horns
ml>> and bringing it up to rob ;)
BM> Not a problem.... just bugs me when people point the finger at thos
BM> software without due diligence..
NB> Same. Which is why I wasn't about to do a damn thing for the guy. Kudos
NB> to you for that, though.
I just wanted to resolve an issue.. no more, no less. I'm sure he would have
felt the same way if we said there were "bugs" on his end.
BM> BTW, ask him if that could be part of the Informational logging rather
BM> thn debug. I have 300 different echo folders and it's certainly
BM> putting a hurting on the size of the log... :)
NB> Debug mode in any software is supposed to put a hurt on the size of
NB> your log. Unless you don't care, or you rotate your logs, you may want
NB> to consider NOT running in debug mode all of the time. Only when there
NB> is an issue that needs addressing do you really need to be in that
NB> mode. Debug mode is for when you need every bit of possible information
NB> the software can give in order to pinpoint a problem. When there are no
NB> problems, you're better of staying in the less detailed logging mode.
NB> At least that's how I understand it, anyways. YMMV. :)
Oh, I understand that and from my viewpoint, what we asked Rob to do could be
added into the Informational level as well. Information is a good thing. :)
