Subj : Is binkp/d's security model kaputt?
To : apam
From : Digital Man
Date : Fri Dec 31 2021 09:22 pm
Re: Is binkp/d's security model kaputt?
By: apam to Digital Man on Sat Jan 01 2022 02:55 pm
> > I find the topic of a new messsage network technology interesting and
> > have been following along here.
>
> It's interesting, I'm kind of a little bit fickle about the idea, I'm not
> really sure it's worth pursuing. I mean, from a development point of
> view, making new things for the sake of making new things can be fun, but
> who would use it?
It's always possible that a network could be formed (or switch to) a non-FTN technoloy. And that could then be a new technology. But so far, I haven't found any limitation or issue with QWK that I couldn't address, so that's where I tend to focus my message-networking-innovation. I appreciate your adopting (and testing the interoperability) of some of my QWKnet extensions too.
> > However, before anything "new" is proposed, I suggest a careful
> > examination of what is wrong with the current technology (FTN). I've
> > started my own list here:
>
> Yep, I agree, I read your list, and think it's pretty much spot on.
>
> To be honest though, I think it's a kind of dead end. It's interesting to
> talk about though I suppose.
Yeah, probably a dead end. There's the occasional discussion of the same
subject on FidoNet proper (e.g. Future4fido echo), but I don't think it's ever
going to amount to much because of the compatiblity issue.
> Happy birthday by the way, not sure if it was today or yesterday..
> facebook told me, but I don't know how that works with timezones :)
Thanks. It's still the 31st here in California, so still my birthday (the Unix epoch, for this timezone anyway). :-)
--
digital man (rob)
Breaking Bad quote #4:
Tagging trees is a lot better than chasing monsters. - Hank
Norco, CA WX: 47.0�F, 90.0% humidity, 0 mph ESE wind, 0.01 inches rain/24hrs
