Subj : Re: Is binkp/d's security model kaputt?
To   : Oli
From : tenser
Date : Sat Sep 25 2021 03:27 am

On 23 Sep 2021 at 04:15p, Oli pondered and said...

Ol> There are no FTS-xxxx standards for packet formats in use ;). Only the
Ol> legacy Type 2.0 packets (the one that doesn't support points) defined by
Ol> FTS-0001.

I could have sworn I found some fidonet standardish type document
that described packet formats in some detail.  There were several;
oh, I guess I was looking at FSCs, which are not FTSs. Ok, so use
that as the content type....

Ol> Timeout!
Ol>
Ol> This is just wrong. It's application/json or maybe
Ol> application/x-something or message/x-whatever.

It looks like RFC6838 backs you up there; I stand corrected.
`application/x-foo` seems more appropriate.

Ol> And don't forget:
Ol> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6648

Good point, but that's for new application protocols; we're
not talking about that, we're still using HTTP.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Linux/64)
* Origin: Agency BBS | Dunedin, New Zealand | agency.bbs.nz (21:1/101)

You are viewing proxied material from cvs.synchro.net. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.