Subj : Re: Is binkp/d's security model kaputt?
To : deon
From : tenser
Date : Fri Sep 24 2021 01:04 am
On 23 Sep 2021 at 08:04a, deon pondered and said...
de> No timeout needed yet.
My bad; that came across much snootier than I intended.
de> > The thing to do here is define a small taxonomy of X- tokens
de> > describing various BBS-centric formats and follow what the header
de> > says.
de>
de> Sure, lets muse over that list here...
Something like, `X-ftn/ftsXXX` for legacy formats
defined by Fidonet standards, and something like,
`X-json/x.y.z` for a JSON serialized version,
where `x.y.z` is a semantically versioned schema
identifier?
