Subj : Re: Changes to fsxNet
To : Avon
From : Gamgee
Date : Sun Feb 16 2025 09:55 am
-=> Avon wrote to Gamgee <=-
Ga> The above naming convention triggers an OCD-ish reaction for me... :-)
Av> You're not the only one :)
Ga> Just wondering why three of the echo names are so different (in format)
Ga> than the others... Couldn't they be:
Ga>
Ga> FSX_RET
Ga> FSX_GAM
Ga> FSX_VID
Av> Because it would mean essentially creating new echomail areas and I
Av> don't want to impose that on folks.
Ahhh, yes, OK that makes sense.
Ga> So that they match the "format" of all the others? Haha! Not a HUGE
Ga> problem, but if we're re-arranging things anyway... why not? ;-)
Av> Back in the day all the echomail area tags I was creating were using
Av> that FSX_XXX format but in more recent additions to echomail areas some
Av> folks encouraged me (and I listened) to use tags that were more clearly
Av> understandable/reflective of the content being carried by the echo.
Av> So.. yeps I created a few such as the ones we're discussing... but I
Av> think in the future any new ones I create will likely revert to the
Av> older FSX_XXX convention...
