Subj : Re: Anyone using PGP/GPG in here?
To   : Vk3jed
From : StackFault
Date : Sat Nov 10 2018 09:53 pm

Vk>  St> I have not dug this one very far but depending on the algo used to
Vk>  St> password protect the archive, it might not be too bad in transit. The
Vk>  St> issue is at rest. But again, if privacy is a real issue, use another
Vk>  St> layer.
Vk>
Vk> Yes, you could slip password protection into the archiver command,
Vk> though not sure how that can be done on a per link basis.

Well, the issue with password is the symmetric scheme. Assymmetric would be
much better and you could spread your public key around... That could make a
good POC actually... food for tought I guess, like I didn't had enough
projects already lol.

Vk> The big issue with quantum computing is the ability to solve many
Vk> equations in parallel, which would render all current ciphers vulnerable
Vk> to brute force attacks.  But quantum computing is likely to give us new
Vk> and vastly more powerful encryption.  Quantum key distribution, which is
Vk> immune to key interception has also been demonstrated in test
Vk> environments, I believe. Attempting to intercept a key in transit on a
Vk> quantum channel will resunt in 2 things.  Firstly, the intercepter will
Vk> NOT get a copy of the key, and secondly, the legitimate recipient will
Vk> immediately know someone's tampered with the channel.

Well, this will trigger a revolution that's for sure. The side abou
addressing the confidentiality and non-repudiation is intersting too. I will
read a little bit about that, this is something I am not familiar enough.

Vk>  St> I always found interesting the fact they used old VIC-20 in John Wick
Vk>  St> 2, pretty hard to hack into and since most don't even know how to loa
Vk>  St> a software on it and finding a drive that can read these floppies
Vk>  St> nowadays...
Vk>
Vk> Yeah that seems a bit far fetched, and how well can it run modern crypto
Vk> algorithms anyway?

Not very well that's for sure. The lack of compatibility with modern
computing equipment makes it a challenge in itself. I have some good stories
about old technology seen by younger folks. But this is drifting from the
original topic, it's more obfuscation than encryption at that point...

Regards,

                    � �
���������������� �  �������������������������������������������
 Dave aka Stackfault  � ��  bbs.bottomlessabyss.net (telnet/2023�ssh/2222)
 Bottomless Abyss BBS   ���      21:1/172@fsxnet � 1:249/317@fidonet
-��� --- - - --- -- �-�� � ��� ���    �- -��� -�-- ��� ���     -��� -��� ���

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A39 2018/04/21 (Linux/64)
* Origin: The Bottomless Abyss BBS (21:1/172)