Subj : Re: 1984.ws
To : fusion
From : tenser
Date : Fri Jun 02 2023 11:17 pm
On 01 Jun 2023 at 07:23p, fusion pondered and said...
fu> On 02 Jun 2023, tenser said the following...
fu>
fu> te> True; my mistake. But you did unilaterally
fu> te> say, "kitty will not work correctly with BBS
fu> te> systems." which, again, depends on the BBS
fu> te> system.
fu>
fu>
http://kirin.dcclost.com/~alex/img_a.jpg
fu>
http://kirin.dcclost.com/~alex/img_b.jpg
fu>
fu> this is what 99% of the BBSes you will ever call with kitty will look
fu> like vs what they're supposed to look like.
One could also just do what the Kitty guy said
(admittedly in a jerky way...) and not try to
overload bold attributes for bright colors.
He was obnoxious about it, but he's not wrong
about the technical merits.
fu> i think it's a reasonable assertion. if the sysop has no traditional
fu> ansi on the whole board, then thumbs up i guess.
Right so...it depends on the BBS system? :-)
--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 (Linux/64)
* Origin: Agency BBS | Dunedin, New Zealand | agency.bbs.nz (21:1/101)
