Subj : Re: Problem at your system
To   : Wilfred van Velzen
From : deon
Date : Wed Jan 25 2023 08:34 am

 Re: Re: Problem at your system
 By: Wilfred van Velzen to deon on Tue Jan 24 2023 04:15 pm

>  de> I'm not sure it would be against a standard to put nulls in a field
>  de> that a standard would describe "dont use in this case" (and in this
>  de> particular scenario, I think we are talking about if an INTL kludge
>  de> exists).
>
> Non of the FTSC documents say that.

So I was going to re-view the standard (but the website is down). Does it say ignore the packed message header and use INTL if it exists instead?

> FTS-0001 is quite clear about what is supposed to be in the packed message
> header.

I agree - but we have a differing view point on when it should be used :(

> There is currently an election on going for FTSC standing members, maybe you
> should apply? ;-)

I was there once - I'm struggling with many projects and not enough arms and legs, and I dont want to give it a half baked effort. There are other reasons to, but they dont need to be public. I'll mull it over though...


...����
--- SBBSecho 3.15-Linux
* Origin: I'm playing with ANSI+videotex - wanna play too? (3:633/509)

You are viewing proxied material from cvs.synchro.net. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.