Subj : Re: Fmail Compression and Decompression
To : Michiel van der Vlist
From : Wilfred van Velzen
Date : Mon Aug 21 2023 04:33 pm
Hi Michiel,
On 2023-08-21 14:45:17, you wrote to me:
WV>> At the time the choice was made, because rar compressed better. And
WV>> because it still works there is no reason to change this.
MvdV> It is no secret that I am not a member of the "more is better" club. In the
MvdV> POTS age with high cost of data transport "compressed better" was a valid
MvdV> argument. Although even then in the end of the compression evolution the
MvdV> added value was so small that it didn't really matter anymore. Is another
MvdV> one percent of compression efficiency realy worth it.
It was way more then 1%...
MvdV>>> How many in Amiganet still actually use an Amiga?
WV>> Enough...
MvdV> Enough to lkep LAH alive?
Yes.
MvdV>>> The problem with keeping all these antiquaria, is that you also
MvdV>>> have to support it. This will become increasingly difficult
MvdV>>> when the knowledge evaporates...
WV>> This is true for all of Fidonet technology. Keeping this old
WV>> techniques working is partly what makes it interesting...
MvdV> True but at some point one has to make choices that every museum has to
MvdV> make. What do we keep and what do we drop? I see little value in keeping
MvdV> more then one compression method alive for Fidonet. Yes, it is interesting
MvdV> to keep Fidonet alive. But not ALL of the technology that was ever used.
MvdV> Drop some and focus on keeping the rest alive.
Well, in this case it doesn't matter what you think. It's what the AmigaNet users want... ;-)
And in a museum available "real" space is probably a lot more expensive then available "virtual" space in AmigaNet, which is kind of limitless...
Bye, Wilfred.
--- FMail-lnx64 2.2.0.0
* Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)
