Subj : Re: Issues running a FMailW32 scan
To : Wilfred van Velzen
From : Jason Bock
Date : Tue Jul 18 2023 12:35 pm
WvV> Hi Jason,
WvV>
WvV> On 2023-07-18 08:37:10, you wrote to me:
WvV>
WvV> JB> I just tried it and still does not find any new messages but FE
WvV> does.
WvV> JB> See below:
WvV>
WvV> C:\FMail>> fmailw32 scan /S
WvV> JB> FMail-W32-2.2.0.0 - The Fast Echomail Processor
WvV> JB> Copyright (C) 1991-2023 by FMail Developers - All rights reserved
WvV>
WvV>
WvV>
WvV> JB> Scanning netmail directory...
WvV>
WvV>
WvV> JB> Scanning JAM message bases for outgoing messages...
WvV> JB> Rescanning all JAM areas
WvV> JB> Scanning JAM area 0: AGN_ADS
WvV> JB> Scanning JAM area 1: AGN_ART
WvV> JB> Scanning JAM area 2: AGN_BBS
WvV> JB> ...
WvV> JB> Scanning JAM area 230: Z1_ROUTING
WvV> JB> Scanning JAM area 231: Z1_SYSOP
WvV> JB> Scanning JAM area 232: Z39_AMY
WvV> JB> Scanning JAM area 233: ZEC
WvV> JB> Scanning JAM area 234: ZEUS_AMY
WvV> JB> No new outgoing messages
WvV>
WvV> JB> Scanning Hudson message base for outgoing messages...
WvV> JB> No new outgoing messages
WvV>
WvV> JB> Netmail: 0, Personal: 0, Hudson: 0, JAMbase: 0
WvV> JB> Msgbase net: 0, echo: 0, dup: 0, bad: 0
WvV>
WvV> JB> Scan Active: 47.520 sec.
WvV>
WvV> So it seems to scan all your areas, in which one of those should it find
WvV> a new message? And can you show the message (The flags should be
WvV> interesting), in for instance golded?
WvV>
WvV> Bye, Wilfred.
WvV>
WvV> --- FMail-lnx64 2.2.0.0
WvV> * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)
Wilfred,
I should have kept the snip in there showing it found messages. <duh> on my part. Been so much personally going on around me during the last few days with our dog. :(
I use ProBoard v2.30-A1u4 (Alpha), Internet Rex and now FMail. ;)
My next step is to get netmail to import, but I believe currently it only supports Hudon, right? If so, is there any timeframe for JAM support?
Since FMail is tossing/scanning well, I have a couple questions.
Is there any possibility that FMail will support Squish or *.MSG formats coming to/from packets?
If I sent you ProBoard file structures, could there be tighter integration with ProBoard?
