Subj : Re: test
To   : Carlos Navarro
From : Wilfred van Velzen
Date : Mon Nov 24 2025 09:24 pm

Hi Carlos,

On 2025-11-24 20:54:58, you wrote to me:

WV>> I found it, and I can confirm your findings. I can also see it's
WV>> still present in .pkt files that left my system to my other links.
WV>> But it isn't present in my messagebase!?

CN> I can see the empty PATH kludge with GoldED, but just before the message text,
CN> instead of after the SEENBY lines.

So on top of the message where all the regular kludge lines are?

CN>>> -+- SBBSecho 3.23-Win32
CN>>>  # Origin: cyb synchronet point (2:341/234.5885)
CN>>> ^aPATH:
CN>>> SEEN+BY: 341/234
CN>>> ^aPATH: 341/234

WV>> Odd, it switches the order of the original Path line and the seen-by!?

CN> Yes, it's weird.

After reading the "PATH" section in fsc-0074.001, the proposed successor of fts-0004.001, which has much better definitions of everything, I got a theory about this.

fsc-0074.001 states:

   -  Shall begin with the seven character literal:

           ^APATH:<space>

The empty PATH line in your messages doesn't have the space before the new line, so FMail probably doesn't regard this as a PATH line, but as a regular line. And puts it at the end of the message text, before the newly generated seen-by's and path lines.

WV>> Can you send me the original .pkt file from your SBBS point? So I can
WV>> try to reproduce it?

CN> Ok, check your inbound.

Got it, thanks.

WV>> BTW2: .pkt files that leave my point system don't have a path line at
WV>> all.

CN> Mine neither...

Except for your Synchronet point system...


Bye, Wilfred.

--- FMail-lnx64 2.3.2.4-B20240523
* Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)