Subj : Re: A packet format question
To   : LARS KELLOGG-STEDMAN
From : BEN RITCHEY
Date : Thu Mar 10 2011 07:09 am

* An ongoing debate between Lars Kellogg-Stedman and All rages on ...

| LS> Suggesting that either the final message body is missing a NUL or the
| LS> end-of-packet marker is incorrect.  In your opinion: is this permitted
| LS> by FTS-0001?  This question is of mostly academic interest, since the

Yes and no, matter of interpretation. :) Mostly no as three null bytes are
usually used, though what else could a second null be, and why 3? {g}

--
Be well    :^)

: Ben   aka cMech    http://bellsouthpwp.net/c/m/cmech617/
:
+    WildCat! Board 24/7  +1-337-984-4794  any BAUD 8,N,1
--- GoldEd+/DOS v1.1.5cM
* Origin: FIDONet - The Positronium Repository (1:393/68)

You are viewing proxied material from cvs.synchro.net. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.