Subj : Help request
To : Mike Luther
From : Roger Nelson
Date : Mon Dec 06 2010 07:18 am
On Sun Dec-05-2010 21:48, Mike Luther (1:117/3001) wrote to Mark Lewis:
ML> Aha!
ml> MikeL> Does NETMAIL really have to be set up in only its' own
ml> GROUP that
ml> MikeL> has only a 'seen by' of the 117/100 HUB here?
ml> i'm not sure i'm understanding your problem, mike...
ml> the default general netmail area (that is managed by
ml> FE and a dynamic mailer like FD) doesn't have a group
ml> assignment...
ml> can you explain a bit more, please?
ML> I think you may have hit the nail on the head. As I got this whole
ML> monstor of 117/100 years ago whne it actually was left on the front
ML> porch (!) it had a "Netmail" enbtry in the FE area lists! That
ML> group in which it still 'is' shows that you at 396/345 are shown to
ML> 'see' it. Which I now think I understand is how this junk NetMail
ML> stuff may be showing up to you on the FTP server connection I poll
ML> you from. Yes,the traffic goes into a 'hold' que as is 'normal'
ML> for your traffic outbound. But you shouldn't show up as 'seen by'
ML> for this as an 'echo' area at all as far as I can understand this.
ML> This defined NETMAIL area is defined in the 'ADMINISTRATIVE' area
ML> here,and it is a 'standard' Fido area on 1:117/100 here. 1:117/100
ML> does have a default NETMAIL editor for the system and as well the
ML> MAX BBS application for it does also define tne NETMAIL area and
ML> SQUISH handles it properly for NETMAIL as well as the IE operation.
ML> I can read/receive and originate NETMAIL in either tool an things
ML> work the same.
ML> Thus should I simply remove this strange 'NETMAIL' area in the FE
ML> area and see what happens?
ML> Thanks!
mark should not show up at all in net 396! He is 1:3634/12.
Regards,
Roger
--- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+
* Origin: NCS BBS - Houma, LA - (1:3828/7)
