Subj : Routing files
To   : mark lewis
From : Barry Blackford
Date : Tue Jan 08 2002 08:41 am

Hello there mark!

06 Jan 02 at 10:06, mark lewis writes to Steve Quarrella:

SQ>> Do you _route_ files, though? :-)  Processing files is one
SQ>> thing.  Receiving a file from 1:3830/9.9 and passing it onto
SQ>> 1:3830/9.10 is the objective I'm trying to fulfill.

ml> did you ever solve this?

Damn it Mark! That was going to be my question too (just catching up on this
thread), I have the same problem but I don't use route.fe just the built in
configuration - because route.fe stopped working last time I used it and I just
switched back to the inbuilt routing.
But looking at it I think "the boys" are correct about the route-to & route-for
verbs, unfortunately there is no inbuilt equivelent of those that I know of?

Best Rgds, Bazz
[email protected]
---
* Origin: Global NetWork ARGUS IP Mailer & FTP Fidonet New Zealand (3:774/605)

You are viewing proxied material from cvs.synchro.net. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.