Subj : Routing files
To : Steve Quarrella
From : Paul Quinn
Date : Sat Dec 08 2001 02:59 pm
Hi! Steve,
On 07 Dec 01 09:32, Steve Quarrella wrote to Paul Quinn:
PQ>> I used various forms of FroDo for about 4 years with FastEcho
PQ>> (FE). All mail _routing_ was handled via a FE route file,
SQ> Move your underscores a bit <heh>: _Mail_ routing. In my case, I
SQ> have a similar situation. I've used (and continue to use) FD here on
SQ> 1:393/9005 for years, but file routing is a function of my ROUTE.FD.
Mmm... maybe I have been using Binkley-style outbound (BSO) for too long,
already. ;-)
In a BSO situation, your tosser is the mail & files router. A true Binkley
system has no equivalent to a Route.Fd file... unfortunately.
SQ> Now that I'm using a Binkley-style outbound with Radius, I continue
SQ> to do the ROUTE.FE thing, similar to what you do, but files
SQ> themselves just sit in my inbound and go nowhere. <scratching head>
It's conceivable that FE could leave the files in the inbound and just
reference them, there, in the .FLO file(s).<shrug> It still doesn't work, huh?
BTW, I gave up on FroDo at about the time when JoHo introduced the 2.2x version
with static outbound (queues?). I just never investigated what that was all
about. So, if you're trying to shoehorn a FroDo static outbound with a BSO
with Radius, I can't assist.
SQ> So what is ol' Steve doin' wrong here?
Forget FroDo... utterly. Dump it & go BSO only. :)
Are you using different FE config files between the two systems? I don't wanna
tell you how to suck the eggs, but you have told FE to use a 'Binkley/Xenia'
mailer in FeSetup, now that you're toss/pack-ing mail to Radius' outbound?
Cheers,
Paul.
--- BT-W32 2.60XEg6/BinkD-W32 0.9.5
* Origin: He's got a magnet! Everybody stand back! (ZMH only) (3:640/384)
