Subj : Re: Observations of the current ELIST.RPT
To   : mark lewis
From : Wilfred van Velzen
Date : Sun Jan 09 2022 07:22 pm

Hi mark,

On 2022-01-09 12:21:24, you wrote to me:

WV>> Maybe that was a good idea in 1987, when Fidonet was totally
WV>> different. But it is not current practice for the ELIST.

ml> i said it was one reason for listing non-distributed echotags... i didn't
ml> say anything about it being current practise... other reasons are for
ml> ownership and archives...

Ownership of a dead area? What's the point?

The (current) ELIST is not for archiving. It's for listing active areas IMHO...

ml> there are others, as well...

Well please mention them. I don't see it...

ml> whether you agree with them or not is another matter...

;)

Bye, Wilfred.

--- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
* Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)

You are viewing proxied material from cvs.synchro.net. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.