Subj : DirectX 9.0c software versus Video HARDWARE DIRECTX 9 or 10+?
To : All
From :
[email protected]
Date : Fri Jan 04 2019 12:53 am
X-Received: by 10.66.80.41 with SMTP id o9mr7611378pax.4.1357278819655;
Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:53:39 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.49.116.135 with SMTP id jw7mr8693102qeb.10.1357278819249; Thu,
03 Jan 2013 21:53:39 -0800 (PST)
Path:
eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!fee
der.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!f6no8917461pbd.1!news-out.google.com!s
9ni79141pbb.0!nntp.google.com!b8no2031281pbd.0!postnews.google.com!d10g2000yqe.
googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups:
alt.windows-xp,alt.os.windows-xp,microsoft.public.windowsxp.setup_deployment,mi
crosoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support,microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 21:53:39 -0800 (PST)
Complaints-To:
[email protected]
Injection-Info: d10g2000yqe.googlegroups.com; posting-host=199.189.229.221;
posting-account=5SXNEQkAAAC6SFadCHPE9O-jLMHq7h-Y
NNTP-Posting-Host: 199.189.229.221
References: <5a5d2214-342b-4c2c-a655-ea2e21bbb34c@qi8g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>
<
[email protected]> <
[email protected]>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1;
Trident/4.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152;
.NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET4.0C),gzip(gfe)
Message-ID: <a203cb57-527f-47bb-98c2-766cfbe70872@d10g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>
Subject: DirectX 9.0c software versus Video HARDWARE DIRECTX 9 or 10+?
From: Greegor <
[email protected]>
Injection-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 05:53:39 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.windows-xp:4032 alt.os.windows-xp:5437
microsoft.public.windowsxp.setup_deployment:2477
microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support:30925
microsoft.public.windowsxp.general:106312
OK, I'm firmly convinced that for Win XP, DirectX 9.0c is the
latest installable DirectX module.
But I got a casual (easy) game collection CD for the holidays
that is for Windows XP, but requires DIRECTX 9.0
in the video card and didn't like the 9.0c SW module.
I also looked into video cards to possibly upgrade
enough to run W7 or W8 fairly well and noticed
that various video cards have DIRECTX 10 or ? in them.
Apparently this opens the door to having Direct X 10 or 11
on a Windows XP computer.
Why would DIRECTX 9.0 in a vid card work better
than the DirectX 9.0c software module for a game?
Is there a lot of other software that runs on WinXP
but can even use DIRECTX 10 (in video hardware)?
It's not like these are slow computers where
software DirectX runs slow or anything...
Is hardware DIRECTX 10 or 11 fairly common
for on board video in newer mother boards?
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.1
* Origin: Prison Board BBS Mesquite Tx //telnet.RDFIG.NET www. (1:124/5013)
