Subj : Re: a small suggestion for future releases about mail size limit
To : All
From : HECTOR SANTOS
Date : Thu Jan 31 2019 07:10 pm
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 10:44:19 -0400
From: HECTOR SANTOS
To: CHRIS CRANFORD
Subject: Re: a small suggestion for future releases about mail size limit
Newsgroups: win.server.wish.list
Message-ID: <
[email protected]>
References: <
[email protected]>
X-WcMsg-Attr: Rcvd
X-Mailer: Wildcat! Interactive Net Server v7.0.454.5
Lines: 37
Well, he has a point. For a subscription based system, you can allow X
size for one type of subscription/security profile versus another.
It was always part of the futures list as part of the big change when we
finally move the message databases to support long file names and possibly
an alternative storage system that would better support "size options" on a
per user basis. Right now, it would be a major server overhead to do the
same thing.
----
<CHRIS CRANFORD> wrote in message
news:
[email protected]...
> Most mail servers that I'm familiar with have this as a global option.
Just
> out of curiousity, what would be the reasoning for having this available
per
> security profile instead of a common global mail server option?
>
> Chris
>
> <ARNAUD DE BONALD> wrote in message news:
[email protected]...
> > Hello Hector & all,
> >
> > I would be nice if, in a future AUP, we could configure the maximum
> > E-mail message size allowed pair access profile to be received or sent
> > by an user.
> >
> >
> >
> > --------------------
> > Arnaud de Bonald - Paris, France - Sysop Netcava BBS
>
http://www.netcava.net
>
>
* Origin: Prison Board BBS Mesquite Tx //telnet.RDFIG.NET www. (1:124/5013)
