Subj : D'Bridge 3.99/SR16 released and avai
To : Nick Andre
From : Roger Nelson
Date : Tue Dec 05 2017 08:40 pm
On Sun Dec-03-2017 21:09, Nick Andre (1:229/426) wrote to Mark Lewis:
NA> On 03 Dec 17 19:59:50, Mark Lewis said the following to Nick
NA> Andre:
ML> NA> And I have politely emailed them a few times now, filled out forms,
ML> NA> submitted every recent release for their review, etc etc.
ML> NA> Crickets chirping.
ML> maybe there are not enough others reporting the FP??
NA> A decent anti-virus product should treat every inquiry seriously
NA> and not just when enough people make a case out of something. At
NA> the very least, have a working Contact Us form on its website. But
NA> thats not as amusing as this:
NA>
https://www.virustotal.com/#/file/6a7234448baf4c66951528e91b8f73f49
NA> 1ae5d9b19b1 0ebb8c131afe455244f1/detection
NA> Nevermind that this piece of crap Clam chowder poor excuse poorly
NA> supported "product" gives a false positive, but it gives a false
NA> positive where other WORSE crap poor excuse poorly supported
NA> alternatives PASS the files with no problem.
NA> None of this would be an issue if it wasn't the fact that Clam
NA> Chowder never replies to my repeated messages and Janis at first
NA> treated the Clam results as more accurate than mine - I was told in
NA> no uncertain terms to "clean up my mess" and future hatching on the
NA> NAB would be affected.
I remember that. I thought it was a poor, ill-conceived command(?) on her
part, but live and learn, I guess.
Those of us who are still using D'Bridge learned long ago to ignore remarks
like that.
Regards,
Roger
--- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+ Our XP machine is in the dark
* Origin: NCS BBS - Houma, LoUiSiAna - (1:3828/7)
